So, where is the money coming from?

This will soon be written out more carefully, but this is a first shot,  says daniel at 15.15 on Friday

Daniel

It may not be as bad as all that, provided we clear the myths and lies away and have a proper discussion.

employment – providing good, useful, sustainable jobs for those who are here, whilst not growing the population – issues here around work permits etc.

Some expenditure leads to savings – like energy efficiency, so it can be financed by borrowing, we can even borrow from ourselves. If we borrow from tthe £600  million in our own Strategic Reserve to pump-prime investment in insulating buildings across the island, how can we lose? We need a coordinated policy across the board to achieve this – creating a stable and assured market, ensuring quality control, training for all skill levels in the energy efficiency and generation sectors.

Note that all this requires forward thinking . Is this the feeling you get as you watch the Low Value Consignment Relief shipwreck unfold? “It was good whilst it lasted” – but surely Jersey can provide its residents with better, more fulfilling, more useful and  more sustainable jobs than this?

Our very very low public sector expenditure gives us wiggle-room  Just as Senator Ozouf rightly spent money into the recession via the Fiscal  Package, so we can do the same again. Government can take on the role of keeping people in work, or enabling and stimulating that to happen, for example with the island-wide building insulation scheme mentioned above. Further ahead, we should be far more proactive in getting on with harnessing wind and wave power. The market for energy is rather more secure than the market for tax-dodging CD’s.

Of course people in work means that instead of paying out benefits, the States are collecting taxes. What are we waiting for?

Similarly, there is absolutely nothing stopping us from spending more on health. In fact we will have to. In order to keep the costs of health within the bounds of affordability, (and the costs will inevitably rise with the increasing costs of treatment and the ageing population) there will have to be more effort put into prevention – helping us all to become more healthy.  In the short term this too is an area of new employment.

Just as with energy efficiency, spending soon saves vastly  more expense later.

But still, where is the money coming from? How can we raise more in a fair way? Because, make no mistake the backlog is so huge that one way or another taxes and charges will increase in the years ahead.  Here are some possible ways:

iik’s paying a little bit more. I do not have the figures at my finger-tips but their tax rate is a tiny fraction of what the rest of us pay. Is this right? Could they not contribute a bit more?

or Social Security payments by employees above the ceiling. This was going to be introduced, but was withdrawn recently by the treasury Minister as we ‘did not need the money’ though he did say it would return later.

or a windfall tax on the value of land when it is rezoned. This would not be a regular predictable source of income, says the Treasury Minister, but the sums involved are very large indeed and not to be sniffed at – after the 2002 Island Plan certain land rose in value an estimated £50 million. Why should those few landowners become instant millionaires for simply owning a piece of land which happens to switch from agricultural to building land?

Some States members have called for a full study into just exactly how progressive our overall tax and benefit system is, and how our overall tax rates compare with competitors.

Responses

  1. “Why should those few landowners become instant millionaires for simply owning a piece of land which happens to switch from agricultural to building land?”

    Isn’t that whats kept many members being voting in year after year. As the amount of land able to be rezoned falls so will their votes. It wont be too long before making people rich by rezoning is finished and then where will those who have benefitted the land owners garner their votes from?

    When that time comes they will probably be off to finer shores on their little backhander benefits.

  2. You wrote:

    “Just as Senator Ozouf rightly spent money into the recession via the Fiscal Package”

    This is fine as far as it goes but he is attempting to cut public spending, by dressing it up as “efficiency” measures. His overall policy fails if we are if we are in a depression rather than a recession. Even conventional economics realises that recessions and depressions are structurally very different – the conventional remedies to both are different. If Philip Ozouf, not to mention other government shapers locally, nationally and internationally continue to prescribe remedies based on a fundamentally wrong analysis and diagnosis of the states of the economies, then they can only make the turmoil worse, more painful and longer lasting.

    Here’s me slugging it out, in the comment section, with Senator Ozouf on his blog. My final comment has not been published yet.

    • Nick,

      You are right in saying that we need completely new solutions. Therefore we need to elect politicians with the wit to see that this is so, and the nouse to then get people in to start working on these solutions.

      There will also be a need to involve citizens, worker organisations and business people in the process.

      I see no signs of any of this happening under the “old guard”.

      I recommend Nick’s link to him and Ozouf “slugging it out.” Tough going in places, but worth it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: